Writing Portfolio

Information Supplied By:

Terra's writing portfolio can be seen at http://terralanders.blogspot.com
Showing posts with label CPSC recalls. Show all posts
Showing posts with label CPSC recalls. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 25, 2012

Lee Carter Company Infant Rattle poses choking hazard

Lee Carter Company, based in San Francisco, CA is having a bad week.  Earlier Safety Spot wrote about a recall of Lee Carter's set of 12 Mexican wrestling figures due to excessive lead in the paint.  In addition to that recall, the company just announced another recall for 25,000 Infant Rattles.
The handle of the rattle is small enough to fit into the back of the throat, creating a choking hazard for infants. The federal safety requirement for rattles (16 CFR 1510) restricts any part of a rattle from “entering and penetrating to the full depth of a cavity in a test fixture with dimensions shown in figure 1.”
The colorful woven-plastic rattle has a bell captured inside and measures 4-1/2” from end to end. The retail hangtag is printed with the words “Made in Mexico” and “Lee Carter Company.” Just as with the wrestling figures also recalled this week, the rattles were sold in Mexican craft stores across the USA.
The Rattles involved in this recall, sold for $4 each from February 2011 and through October 2011.  Consumers who have purchased these figures should scour the kids’ toy boxes and remove them immediately and return them to Lee Carter Co. for a refund replacement product credit.
The company can be contacted directly by collect call to (415) 824-2004 or via their website at http://www.leecartercompany.com.

Monday, December 19, 2011

Quality & Design Issues force recall of two infant rattle sets

Two collections of infant rattles were recalled from store shelves in Colorado and Dallas last week.  Distributed by Toy Distribution of Los Angeles, one set of five rattles and the other set of nine rattles were sold in toy stores in the two states from December 2009 thru December 2010 at the quality-assuring price of $2.00 a set.

Yes, the facetiousness does seep in here, I admit.  But really folks – how does it make sense that toys that cost less than a cup of coffee can actually be trusted to be safe for an active, teething infant, the most vulnerable of our consumers?  It’s obvious that price alone is not an indication of safety or quality, but certainly it should be one factor that caregivers use to guide their decisions. Quality, toughness and durability built into toys are costly, but for an infant toy, these features should top the list.  Chinese manufacturers, Winning Key Manufacturing and Topwin Toys, HK, produced these sets, and the December 13, 2011 CPSC announcement indicates that only 50 sets are involved.    

In the case of these rattles, small parts can break off creating a choking hazard for children under three years of age.  The plastic handles have a rounded shape at the ends that have the potential to become pushed into the back of the child’s throat, blocking the airway, also creating a choking hazard.  If the child is toddling and falls with the end of the handle in their mouth, this could cause harm to the roof of the mouth or soft pallet. 

Photo: CPSC

  • Item name HANDBELL TOYS printed at the top left-hand corner of the boxes. 
  • The name "JUNYI" printed on the front top right-hand corner of one box with item number 58083801 on a white sticker on the back of the box.
  • The name "XIN DA MEI" printed on the front of the box in the top right-hand corner, with the item number 308363 on a white sticker on the back of the box.

Consumers who think they may possess these sets should remove the toys from  child use immediately and contact the place of purchase for refund or replacement. Toys Distribution can be reached directly at (323) 266-8088, or via email at mailbox@shoptdi.com .

Monday, October 24, 2011

Recent Food-Related Recalls Cause Concern


Although the media is much more likely to set off all the bells and whistles for a toy recall, the Federal Food and Drug Association’s (FDA) food safety alerts seem to get much less attention.  From September 1 through October 24, 2011 CPSC announced eight recalled toys covering a total quantity of 1,863,805 units. The safety issues involved in these eight recalls include a laceration injury, 2 potential small part choking incidents, 1 lead paint incident and one potential suffocation concern.  These recalls were prompted by one injury and three child-involved incidents where no injury occurred, as well as toy manufacturers' own product integrity program checks and balances.

On the other hand, during that same time period, the FDA has announced a whooping 45 food-related recalls!  These food alerts included violations that could result in illness, reactions and infections that range from serious to life threatening.  The FDA recalls rarely list a quantity of units involved, so it might be reasonable to assume that these potentially expose many more consumers to harm than those toys recalled during the same time period.

Take a look at what the last fifty-five days of food recalls brought to light:
      • Wire pieces in snacks
      • Undeclared milk
      • Undeclared peanuts
      • Undeclared sulfites
      • Undeclared wheat
      • Undeclared gluten
      • Undeclared egg
      • Undeclared tree nuts
      • Undeclared shrimp
      • Uneviserated fish
      • Listeria monocytogenes
      • Salmonella
      • Elevated levels of histamine

Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella are both organisms that can cause serious to fatal infections in young children, as well as individuals who are elderly, frail or have compromised immune systems. Listeria infection has also been known to cause miscarriages and stillbirths among pregnant women. Elevated levels of histamine in food can cause various reactions, which may not be limited to a burning sensation in the mouth, facial swelling, rash, hives or itchy skin.  Others might experience nausea, vomiting or diarrhea.  Wire mesh or small fragments of wire pieces caused scratching and scraping in and around the mouth, gums and throat.

Twenty-two undeclared allergens, 15 cases of Listeria monocytogenes contamination, and eight cases of Salmonella contamination make up the majority of the food health warnings.  While smaller food producers were called out in these alerts, big players like General Mills, Nestle, Kroger, Kraft, Pepperidge Farms and Quaker Oats were also culprits.  With numbers and name brands like these being recalled within only 55 days, it is surprising that more attention to FDA’s failing report card does make the headlines.  In fact, for the most part, they barely made a blip on the media radar.

The FDA is the federal agency held responsible for overseeing most of the food supply in the United States. Their goal remains to protect the public health by ensuring the nation’s food supply is safe, correctly labeled and packaged.  It’s a tough job, since they face increasing challenges in this world of globalization. Innovative new food and animal drug technologies seem to be changing faster than the rules and regulations can address. More and more people are becoming sensitive to airborne and foodborne pathogens, making undeclared allergens a serious concern.  The escalated problem with obesity in our children and adults provides a petri dish for many chronic medical conditions.  Surprisingly, the FDA states that intentional contamination of food is also a growing concern.


On January 4, 2011, the President signed into law the new Food Safety Modernization Act of 2011 (FSMA).  This was the first major revamping of the food safety & protection system in almost three-quarters of a century!  The new FSMA enhances FDA authority, encourages partnerships and expands protection system from “farm to table.” (1) Hopefully these new provisions will help reduce the alarming quantity of food safety contaminations that are making their way to our pantry shelves.